Subscribe

RSS FEEDS:

Subscribe by RSS

Add to Google

Subscribe in Bloglines
Add to My AOL

Subscribe by Email:

Categories

« Comparing Personal Injury Verdicts Across Jurisdictions | Main | FDA Limits Warning on Suicide Risk from SSRI Anti-Depressants to Adults up to Age 24 »

The Supreme Court Punitive Damages Decision in Philip Morris - Good for Plaintiffs?

Jun 14, 2007 12:44:00 PM

On its face, the United States Supreme Court's Philip Morris v. Williams decision earlier this year tossing out a $79.5M punitive damage award in an Oregon smoking case where the compensatory damages were $821,000, was seen as a victory for big business in limiting punitive damage awards.

However, New York personal injury lawyer, Eric Turkewitz takes a contrarian view, and argues persuasively in his blog that the dissent of Justice Stevens in the Philip Morris case suggests that high punitive damage multipliers will be allowed in future cases.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341f44b253ef00df351e1a3d8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Supreme Court Punitive Damages Decision in Philip Morris - Good for Plaintiffs?:

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.